Medisinske artikler

Vitenskaplig forskning er avgjørende for medisinsk og teknologisk utvikling. Her er et utvalg av artikkel-henvisninger:
Klikk på overskriften "Medisinske artikler".


-Bensalah et al. Tumor size and nephron-sparing surgery: does it still matter?. European Urology (2008) vol. 53 (4) pp. 691-3

-Sulser. Is kidney surgery going to be minimally invasive in all cases?. European Urology (2007) vol. 52 (6) pp. 1549-53

-Siemer et al. Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol (2007) vol. 52 (4) pp. 1156-63


-Zigeuner and Pummer. Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: surgical approach and prognostic factors. Eur Urol (2008) vol. 53 (4) pp. 720-31

-Tsivian et al. A sealed laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a new technique. Eur Urol (2007) vol. 52 (4) pp. 1015-9

-Simone et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy: perioperative and oncologic outcomes from a randomised prospective study. European Urology (2009) vol. 56 (3) pp. 520-6

-Bachmann et al. Retroperitoneoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO): Solving the Technical Difficulties. European Urology (2006) vol. 49 (2) pp. 264-272

-Comparison of Open versus Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Techniques inTreatment of Uretero-Pelvic Junction Obstruction.  European Urology 44 (2003) 340-345


-Shabsigh et al. Defining Early Morbidity of Radical Cystectomy for Patients with Bladder Cancer Using a Standardized Reporting Methodology. European Urology (2008) pp.

-Bhatta Dhar et al. Nerve-sparing radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder replacement in female patients. European Urology (2007) vol. 52 (4) pp. 1006-14


-Secin et al. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Lessons Learned in Surgical Technique. European Urology Supplements (2006) vol. 5 (19) pp. 942-949

-Heidenreich, A., Ohlmann, C. H., & Polyakov, S. (2005). Salvage Radical Prostatectomy. European Urology Supplements, 4(4), 47–52. doi:10.1016/j.eursup.2005.01.004


-Bader et al. Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure?. J Urol (2003) vol. 169 (3) pp. 849-54

-Schumacher et al. Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy. European Urology (2008) vol. 54 (2) pp. 344-52

-Briganti et al. Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy. European Urology (2009) vol. 55 (2) pp. 261-70

-Boorjian et al. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol (2007) vol. 178 (3 Pt 1) pp. 864-70; discussion 870-1

-Truesdale et al. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era. J Endourol (2010) vol. 24 (7) pp. 1055-60

-Vanvelthoven et al. Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Adenomectomy (Millin): Pilot Study on Feasibility. European Urology (2004) vol. 45 (1) pp. 103-109

-Hoepffner et al. Finger assisted laparoscopic retropubic prostatectomy (Millin). European Urology Supplements (2006) vol. 5 (19) pp. 962-967


-Canes et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol (2008) vol. 54 (5) pp. 1020-9

-Desai et al. Single-Port Transvesical Simple Prostatectomy: Initial Clinical Report. Urology (2008)

-Fan, X., Lin, T., Xu, K., Yin, Z., Huang, H., Dong, W., & Huang, J. (2012). Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Nephrectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies. European Urology, 62(4), 601–612. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.055

-Kaouk, J. H., & Autorino, R. (2012). Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery (LESS) and Nephrectomy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. European Urology, 62(4), 613–615. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.028

-Stein, R. J., White, W. M., Goel, R. K., Irwin, B. H., Haber, G. P., & Kaouk, J. H. (2010). Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using GelPort as the Access Platform. European Urology, 57(1), 132–137. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.054


-Klingler et al. Haemostasis in Laparoscopy. European Urology (2006) vol. 50 (5) pp. 948-957

-Baranowski et al. Urogenital pain--time to accept a new approach to phenotyping and, as a consequence, management. European Urology (2008) vol. 53 (1) pp. 33-6

Klikk her